> Home > News > News > ECHR IS a Requirement of EU Membership
>  News
ECHR IS a Requirement of EU Membership
Date 16/02/2011 14:25  Author webmaster  Hits 1442  Language Global
By Stuart Agnew MEP
ECHR, Strasbourg; Photo: Council of EuropeThere has been a concerted effort by the political establishment to maintain that the UK’s signature to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is a quite separate subject to our membership of the European Union. 

This is happening because they want us to believe that allowing prisoners the vote is not connected to EU membership, but to the ECHR.

In fact the two are joined together by two distinct bonds:

1.  In addition to being members of the EU, the UK is also a member of an organisation called the Council of Europe, which has a membership of about fifty countries, (several of which are not in continental Europe). Membership of the Council of Europe is dependent upon being signed up to the ECHR and, if the UK withdrew its signature from the ECHR, we would be obliged to leave the Council of Europe.   However no country can be a member of the EU unless it is already a member of the Council of Europe.  Therefore, if we wish to withdraw our signature from the ECHR we MUST leave the EU.

2.  Under Article 6 of The Treaty of the European Union (This is the Treaty that consolidates all the treaties), once the Lisbon Treaty was signed, we have given the EU the power to decide on our behalf whether or not we remain signatories to the ECHR.

This power will formally be put in place later this year. A process we cannot prevent.     

Source: www.stuartagnewmep.co.uk
dave
Why don't we just recall our ambassador in Belgium and tell them to stuff it? They're hardly going to invade us are they.
16
Feb
Will
To be honest, unless we wish to withdraw our signature from ECHR then we will still be in the EU because I don't think that the EU would decide to withdraw our signatories since we give them so much money in the first place.
16
Feb
Ian (Aberdeen)
IF the ECHR were implemented verbatim and in the spirit of true human rights, then our continuing to subscribe to it would not be a problem. There is in principle nothing wrong with the wording of the Act or its original intentions, which were the creation of a fair, just and unbiased society.

Instead the EU has bent, twisted and reshaped the Convention into a tool for promoting 'positive discrimination' (aka 'crusading'Smile and 'political correctness' (aka suppression of free speech) in favour of whichever special-interest group happens to be in the political spotlight.

This in spite of Article 14 declaring 'No Discrimination of ANY kind' and therefore rendering such activity expressly illegal.

I for one don't think we need to ditch the ECHR. On the contrary, we need to ditch the EU. Then get back to the original spirit of the Convention. Therein lies the human-rights issue.
05
Mar
MAIN SITE: UKIP.ORG
www.ukip.org
Irish Referendum 2012

Fiscal Union: The treaty that
condemns you to perpetual debt
 - EFD leaflet for the May 31
Irish Referendum (PDF)
NEWS & ANALYSIS



Lib-Lab-Con Voting
Conference Video
www.ukip.org